The recent resignation of Dr. Niranjan Rajadhyaksha from the 16th Finance Commission has brought a series of developments, prompting a re-evaluation of the commission’s composition and objectives.
Dr. Niranjan Rajadhyaksha, an esteemed figure in the policy landscape as the executive director of Artha Global, tendered his resignation from the 16th Finance Commission citing personal reasons.
His unexpected departure, announced shortly after the commission’s inaugural meeting on February 14, has prompted the government to initiate the process of appointing a replacement member. Rajadhyaksha’s absence poses challenges and opportunities for the commission as it navigates its objectives and responsibilities in shaping fiscal policies.
Finance Commission’s Mandate and Composition
Chaired by the eminent economist Arvind Panagariya, the 16th Finance Commission comprises individuals with diverse expertise, including former expenditure secretary Ajay Narayan Jha, former special secretary Annie George Mathew, and Soumya Kanti Ghosh, Group Chief Economic Advisor at the State Bank of India.
Tasked with the crucial responsibility of recommending the distribution of taxes between the Centre and states, as well as among states, the commission plays an important role in promoting fiscal equity and efficiency.
How the members of Finance Commission are selected?
The selection process for members of the Finance Commission of India begins with the President constituting the commission as mandated by Article 280 of the Constitution. Typically, the commission comprises a chairman and four other members, chosen for their expertise in finance, economics, and public administration.
Before finalizing the appointments, the President may consult with key stakeholders, including the Prime Minister, the Speaker of the Lok Sabha, the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha, and leaders of opposition parties in both houses of Parliament, to ensure consensus. Once appointed, members serve for the duration specified by the President, usually the term of the Finance Commission.
Their independence and impartiality are crucial, as they conduct consultations and make recommendations on the distribution of tax revenues between the central and state governments. The selection process aims to ensure that the commission is composed of individuals with the necessary skills and integrity to fulfill its constitutional mandate effectively.
Evolving Debate on Tax Distribution and State Finances
The 16th Finance Commission’s recommendations hold significance against the backdrop of ongoing debates surrounding tax distribution and state finances. Particularly, concerns have been raised by states, notably those from southern India, regarding the disparity between their contributions to the exchequer and the resources they receive in return.
This debate outlines the necessity for the commission to adopt a unique approach that balances the principles of fiscal equity with the imperatives of economic growth and development.
The resignation of Niranjan Rajadhyaksha from the 16th Finance Commission marks a significant juncture in the commission’s journey, prompting reflection on its trajectory and objectives.
As the commission explores the complexities of fiscal federalism and tax distribution, it must remain steadfast in its commitment to inclusivity, transparency, and accountability.
The commission’s mandate extends far beyond mere fiscal allocations; it embodies the aspirations of diverse stakeholders, from state governments grappling with resource constraints to local bodies striving for greater autonomy in financial matters. In this context, the importance of robust consultations cannot be overstated.
By engaging with a wide array of voices, including states, local bodies, ministries, and experts, the commission can provide invaluable insights that inform its recommendations and encourage consensus-building. Striking this delicate balance requires a comprehensive understanding of regional disparities, sectoral dynamics, and socio-economic indicators.
As the commission charts its course towards formulating its report by October 2025, it must seize the opportunity to catalyze transformative change.
By embracing innovation, leveraging technology, and promoting good governance practices, the commission can pave the way for a more resilient and responsive fiscal architecture.
Moreover, by fostering collaboration and partnership among diverse stakeholders, the commission can promote a sense of collective ownership and shared responsibility towards nation-building.
Ultimately, the true measure of the 16th Finance Commission’s success lies not merely in the recommendations it delivers, but in the tangible impact it has on the lives of millions of citizens across the country. By upholding the principles of equity, efficiency, and effectiveness, the commission can leave a lasting legacy of progress and prosperity for generations to come.
As it embarks on this noble endeavour, the commission must draw inspiration from the rich tapestry of India’s pluralistic ethos, harnessing the power of diversity to forge a more inclusive and sustainable future.
ALSO READ: IIM Lucknow study reveals joblessness rising in country with education levels
Comments 1